Threat modelling per service
STRIDE workshops on the components that matter, with findings tracked to closure.
05 — Security
Cybersecurity & Compliance
Security that engineers adopt, not security that engineers route around.
Controls that slow delivery get bypassed, and a bypassed control is worse than no control because it creates false confidence. We embed security into the paths developers already use — pre-commit hooks, pipeline gates, paved-road templates — so the secure way is also the fastest way.
On the compliance side we build the evidence machinery, not just the policy documents. Automated control evidence, quarterly access reviews and a live risk register mean audit season stops being a two-month fire drill.
What you get
- Security posture assessment & threat model
- Secure SDLC tooling & pipeline gates
- Identity and access architecture
- Penetration test with remediation support
- Compliance control mapping & evidence automation
How we approach it
The parts that usually go wrong.
And what we do differently so they do not.
Shift-left tooling
SAST, DAST, dependency and secret scanning wired into the pipeline with sane thresholds.
Zero-trust identity
Least-privilege IAM, workload identity, short-lived credentials and full session audit.
Audit-ready by design
Control mapping, automated evidence collection and a maintained risk register.
Proof
All case studies
Where this work shipped.
Questions
Before you ask.
Yes. A typical Type I readiness programme runs twelve to sixteen weeks: gap assessment, control implementation, evidence automation, then a readiness review before your auditor engages. We work alongside your auditor; we do not act as one.
We do. Application, cloud configuration and internal network testing, delivered as a prioritised report with reproduction steps, plus a free retest of remediated findings within ninety days.
Have a problem in this area?
Bring us the messy version. We are more useful before the requirements document exists than after it has been signed off.